How to Explain Product of Array Except Self in a Coding Interview (Step-by-Step)

How to Explain Product of Array Except Self in a Coding Interview (Step-by-Step)

This is one of the most instructive medium problems in existence — because the obvious solution is explicitly forbidden. No division. O(n) time. O(1) extra space. Every constraint is designed to push you toward the prefix × suffix insight, and explaining that cleanly is what makes or breaks the interview answer.

In this post, you’ll learn exactly how to walk an interviewer through LeetCode 238: why division is off the table, the two-pass prefix and suffix approach, the O(1) space optimisation that collapses both arrays into one, and every edge case worth raising.


Problem Statement

LeetCode 238 Medium

Given an integer array nums, return an array answer such that answer[i] is equal to the product of all elements of nums except nums[i].

The product of any prefix or suffix of nums is guaranteed to fit in a 32-bit integer.

You must write an algorithm that runs in O(n) time and without using the division operation.

Examples

Example 1
Input: nums = [1, 2, 3, 4]
Output: answer = [24, 12, 8, 6]
Example 2
Input: nums = [-1, 1, 0, -3, 3]
Output: answer = [0, 0, 9, 0, 0]

Constraints

  • 2 <= nums.length <= 105
  • -30 <= nums[i] <= 30
  • The product of any prefix or suffix fits in a 32-bit integer
  • No division allowed
  • Follow-up: Can you solve it in O(1) extra space? (output array does not count)

What Is the Problem?

“For every index i, I need the product of everything to its left multiplied by everything to its right — skipping nums[i] itself. I can’t divide, and I need to do it in O(n). That means I can’t compute the total product and divide out each element, so I need a smarter way to express ‘everything except me’.”

Immediately acknowledging the no-division constraint and explaining why it rules out the obvious approach is the clearest possible signal that you understand the real challenge of the problem.


Step 1: Compare Approaches Before Jumping to Code

✗ Forbidden
Total Product ÷ Self
Compute the product of all elements, divide by each element. O(n) and simple — but division is explicitly banned, and it breaks on zeros.
~ Correct — O(n), O(n) space
Prefix Array + Suffix Array
Build a full prefix product array and a full suffix product array. Multiply them together. Two passes, two extra arrays.
✓ Optimal — O(n), O(1) space
Prefix into Output + Running Suffix
Write prefix products into the output array directly. Then do a single right-to-left pass multiplying in a running suffix — no second array needed.
“I’ll present both — the two-array version is easier to explain and verify; the one-pass suffix optimisation collapses it to O(1) extra space. Both are O(n) time. Knowing both and being able to articulate the trade-off is the complete answer.”

The Key Insight — Every Answer is a Left Product × Right Product

💡 Core Insight

For any index i, the product of all elements except nums[i] is exactly:

answer[i]  =  prefix[i]  ×  suffix[i]

where prefix[i] is the product of all elements to the left of i, and suffix[i] is the product of all elements to the right of i. Both can be computed in a single directional pass — no division required at any step.

“Once I see that the answer at each index is just a left-product times a right-product, it becomes clear that I need two passes — one left-to-right to build prefix values, one right-to-left to build suffix values. The trick in the optimised version is that I don’t need to store the suffix array — I can accumulate it on the fly.”

Step 2: Explain the Algorithm in Plain English

1 Initialise the output array

Create answer of the same length as nums, filled with 1s. This array will first hold prefix products, then be updated with suffix products in-place.

2 Left-to-right pass — fill prefix products

Maintain a running prefix = 1. At each index i, store the current prefix into answer[i], then multiply prefix by nums[i]. After this pass, answer[i] holds the product of all elements to the left of i.

3 Right-to-left pass — multiply in suffix products

Maintain a running suffix = 1. Traverse from right to left. At each index i, multiply answer[i] by the current suffix (which already holds the product of all elements to the right of i), then multiply suffix by nums[i].

4 Return the output array

Each answer[i] now holds prefix[i] × suffix[i] — the product of everything except nums[i]. Return answer.


Prefix × Suffix Visualised — nums = [1, 2, 3, 4]

Walking through both passes step by step. Prefix products flow left → right; suffix products flow right → left.

nums
1
2
3
4
index
0
1
2
3
prefix
1
1
2
6
index 0: nothing to the left → 1  |  index 1: 1  |  index 2: 1×2=2  |  index 3: 1×2×3=6
suffix
24
12
4
1
index 3: nothing to the right → 1  |  index 2: 4  |  index 1: 4×3=12  |  index 0: 4×3×2=24
answer
1×24
=24
1×12
=12
2×4
=8
6×1
=6
Verify: 2×3×4=24 ✓  |  1×3×4=12 ✓  |  1×2×4=8 ✓  |  1×2×3=6 ✓

The O(1) Space Optimisation

🚀 Collapsing to O(1) Extra Space

Instead of allocating a separate suffix array, reuse the answer array and maintain a single suffix integer variable that accumulates as we sweep right-to-left.

Pass 1 (left → right): Write prefix products directly into answer. This is exactly as before.

Pass 2 (right → left): Keep a running suffix = 1. At each index, multiply answer[i] *= suffix, then update suffix *= nums[i]. No second array is ever allocated — the suffix contribution accumulates entirely in one integer.

“The output array itself doesn’t count toward extra space by convention. So after writing prefix products into it, the only additional memory I’m using is a single integer variable for the running suffix. That’s O(1) extra space.”

Step 3: Talk Through the Code

class Solution:
    def productExceptSelf(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
        n = len(nums)
        answer = [1] * n

        # Pass 1 — left to right: fill answer[i] with product of all elements LEFT of i
        prefix = 1
        for i in range(n):
            answer[i] = prefix      # Store current prefix BEFORE including nums[i]
            prefix *= nums[i]       # Extend prefix to include nums[i]

        # Pass 2 — right to left: multiply answer[i] by product of all elements RIGHT of i
        suffix = 1
        for i in range(n - 1, -1, -1):
            answer[i] *= suffix     # Fold in the suffix contribution
            suffix *= nums[i]       # Extend suffix to include nums[i]

        return answer

The key detail to narrate: in Pass 1, we store prefix into answer[i] before multiplying prefix by nums[i] — this is what gives us the product of everything strictly to the left, excluding index i itself. The same logic applies symmetrically to the suffix in Pass 2.


Step 4: Highlight Edge Cases

⚠️ Why Division Fails — The Zero Problem

Even if division were allowed, the naïve total-product-divide approach breaks on zeros. If nums contains a zero, the total product is zero — dividing by zero is undefined. If it contains two or more zeros, every answer is zero. The prefix × suffix approach handles zeros transparently with no special casing.

1 Array contains a single zero — [1, 0, 3, 4]
“Only the element at the zero’s position gets a non-zero answer — everything to its left times everything to its right. Every other position has a zero in either its prefix or suffix, so its answer is zero. The prefix × suffix approach computes this correctly without any zero-checking logic.”
2 Array contains two or more zeros — [1, 0, 0, 4]
“Every position’s prefix or suffix product includes at least one zero — so every answer is zero. The output is all zeros. Again, handled correctly by the algorithm with no special casing.”
3 Array of length 2 — [3, 5]
“The minimum input size. After Pass 1: answer = [1, 3]. After Pass 2: answer[1] *= 1 → 3, then answer[0] *= 5 → 5. Result: [5, 3]. Correct — each element is the other one.”
4 All ones — [1, 1, 1, 1]
“Every prefix and suffix product is 1, so every answer is 1. Output: [1, 1, 1, 1]. Correct and no special casing needed.”
5 Negative numbers — [-1, 1, 0, -3, 3]
“Negative numbers flow through prefix and suffix multiplication unchanged — the algorithm doesn’t distinguish signs from positive values. The zero at index 2 causes the output to be [0, 0, 9, 0, 0] as expected.”

Step 5: State Time and Space Complexity

DimensionComplexityReason
Time O(n) Two separate single-pass traversals — O(n) + O(n) = O(n)
Space O(1) Only two integer variables (prefix, suffix) beyond the output array; output array is excluded by convention
“Time is O(n) — two linear passes, each visiting every element exactly once. Space is O(1) extra — the only additional memory beyond the output array is two running integer variables. If the interviewer counts the output array, space is O(n), but the follow-up explicitly notes that the output array does not count toward the space constraint.”

Interview Checklist for Product of Array Except Self

  • Restate — “product of everything to the left times everything to the right, no division, O(n)”
  • Immediately address the no-division constraint and explain why total-product ÷ self fails on zeros
  • State the core insight — answer[i] = prefix[i] × suffix[i]
  • Describe the two-array version first — easier to explain and verify
  • Then describe the O(1) space optimisation — running suffix variable, no second array
  • Narrate the update order in Pass 1: store prefix BEFORE multiplying — gives strictly left products
  • Same for Pass 2: multiply answer[i] by suffix BEFORE updating suffix
  • Call out: single zero → only one non-zero output; two zeros → all zeros output
  • Call out: output array does not count toward extra space by convention
  • State O(n) time and O(1) extra space

If you can solve Product of Array Except Self cleanly, try these next:

💡 The follow-up interviewers love: “What if the array can contain zeros?” The answer is: the prefix × suffix approach already handles zeros perfectly — no special casing needed. Division-based approaches break on zeros, which is part of why the constraint exists. Knowing this cold demonstrates you understand the problem at a deeper level than the algorithm.
Scroll to Top